TRSign inBuy now

WHY CERBERUS?

Access work reaches far beyond the connection.

Cerberus is an access operations platform that governs server, desktop, and terminal work through person, resource, time, and closure context.

Where it started

The problem was larger than reaching a remote resource.

One maintenance task could split into a network request, a system account, a shared password, client setup on the user's computer, and records that would need to be found later.

The connection eventually opened. Its intended person, duration, closure owner, and investigation starting point were tracked separately.

As the number of resources and external support needs grew, the same work repeated. Every new person, resource, or location created another VPN profile, firewall request, local account, and follow-up task.

Cerberus grew from that repetition: access needed to become an operation with a clear owner and an end.

Our aim was to turn scattered access responsibility into one management concern and reduce daily coordination work.

The problems that bothered us

Working methods existed, while the whole remained difficult to manage.

Tasks that looked small on their own combined to create standing access and unclear responsibility.

  1. 01

    Passwords travelled from person to person.

    Target-account passwords moved through messages, files, or conversations. Over time, their copies and holders became hard to see.

    Cerberus retains the user identity in the access decision and keeps the target-account credential under platform custody while preparing the session.
  2. 02

    Every connection created new network work.

    Different locations and supported environments required separate VPN setup, port requests, firewall rules, and user-device configuration.

    With a configured Agent or gateway path, existing network responsibilities remain while user-side connection work moves into one access model.
  3. 03

    Temporary access became standing access.

    When maintenance ended, an open account, forgotten VPN membership, or untracked permission could remain until the next task.

    Cerberus treats person, resource, scope, and time as one access decision and makes closure part of the work.
  4. 04

    Shared accounts hid the person.

    When several people used the same administrator account, the real owner of the connection separated from the account visible on the target.

    Cerberus relates the user's identity and assigned resource in the access decision. The target-system account may remain a separate identity layer.
  5. 05

    Investigation became a hunt for records.

    VPN, server, application, and support records lived in different places, making basic questions about access and closure expensive to answer.

    Cerberus keeps the decision and session lifecycle in one context, giving investigations a stronger starting point.

How we approached it

We designed access as a bounded piece of work.

Cerberus centers the controlled work performed by a specific person on a specific resource.

  1. 01

    Tie access to the work

    Person, resource, purpose, scope, and duration meet in the same work decision.

  2. 02

    Keep passwords outside the work surface

    The target-system password remains under platform custody while the session is prepared.

  3. 03

    Treat closure like the beginning

    Revocation, session state, and closure events remain in the same lifecycle.

What changes in daily work?

A two-hour maintenance task remains a two-hour access task.

Consider an external specialist who needs temporary access to maintain one production server.

The conventional path creates VPN setup, a firewall request, a local account, password handoff, client configuration, and end-of-work follow-up.

With Cerberus, the operations owner selects the existing resource and assigns the user with a defined duration and scope. The target-account credential remains under platform custody while the user opens the work surface.

When maintenance finishes, access is revoked. Active session state, the access decision, and the closure event remain in the same work context.

One maintenance task stays inside one access context.
  • External support
  • Operations teams
  • Multiple locations
  • Growing resource inventory

Why Cerberus?

Because opening access matters only when it remains manageable.

Resource location, protocol, and user count may change. Access retains an owner, a boundary, a closure path, and readable history.

The current product boundary

The core access lifecycle is available today.

Resource inventory, user assignment, time and scope decisions, browser desktop and terminal sessions, active session status, access revocation, and lifecycle events are part of the current product flow.

  • Live visual observation depends on deployment and policy choices.
  • Revocation closes the path for new sessions; active-session termination follows the protocol and deployment model.
  • The video or screen recording, playback, and export surface remains in development.

Let us simplify access work together.

Bring your current resources and operating model; together, we can evaluate where Cerberus can reduce the burden.

Open live demoRead the docs